Five AI pricing scenarios to test before you promise “unlimited”.
This library turns the calculator into a practical launch review. Copy a scenario, enter current provider prices, and decide whether the feature needs a cap, tier, add-on, fallback model, or different plan price.
How to use this without fake precision
- Verify current model prices on official provider pages; MarginPulse does not claim live rates.
- Start with baseline usage, then test one downside scenario that would actually hurt margin.
- Record the calculator memo in the launch doc before publishing plan copy or sales promises.
- Count demand only when a real founder/team requests the worksheet, shares a pricing use case, or expresses purchase intent.
1. Baseline paid account
default plangross marginUse when the product team has a normal expected usage pattern for paid customers.
| Input | Starter value |
|---|---|
| Calls/customer/month | 400 |
| Input tokens/call | 900 |
| Output tokens/call | 350 |
| Decision | Launchable only if margin clears target after other COGS. |
Memo line: “Baseline usage preserves/does not preserve target gross margin at the current plan price.”
2. Heavy-user overage
power userscap designUse when a minority of customers could consume much more AI than the median user.
| Input | Starter value |
|---|---|
| Calls/customer/month | 2,000 |
| Input tokens/call | 1,200 |
| Output tokens/call | 600 |
| Decision | If fragile, add a hard cap, fair-use rule, or paid overage. |
Cap copy: “Includes X AI actions/month; higher usage requires upgrade or add-on.”
3. Free-trial abuse
trialanti-abuseUse before offering free AI credits, ungated demos, or public beta access.
| Input | Starter value |
|---|---|
| Trial accounts | 100 |
| Calls/account/month | 100 |
| Plan price | 0 during trial |
| Decision | Trial usage is pure cost; limit actions and monitor abuse. |
Guardrail: “Free trial includes a small AI action allowance; production-scale usage needs a paid plan.”
4. Team-seat account
B2B SaaSseat pricingUse when one paying workspace can contain many users generating AI calls.
| Input | Starter value |
|---|---|
| Seats/workspace | 10 |
| Calls/seat/month | 250 |
| Workspace plan price | Enter effective price/customer |
| Decision | If per-seat usage is uncapped, workspace pricing can hide loss-making accounts. |
Question: “Is the cap per workspace, per seat, or both?”
5. Premium model fallback
model switchingquality tiersUse when high-quality or long-context calls cost materially more than default calls.
| Input | Starter value |
|---|---|
| Default calls | 350 |
| Premium calls | 50 |
| Premium output tokens | 2–4× baseline |
| Decision | Reserve expensive calls for higher tiers or explicit add-ons. |
Tier copy: “Standard AI uses the default model; premium/long-context AI is limited to higher tiers.”
6. Purchase-intent qualifier
validationsales signalUse in replies to separate useful feedback from vanity attention.
What AI feature are you pricing? Which scenario is the real risk: heavy users, free-trial abuse, team seats, model switching, or something else? Would you use a worksheet/template pack before launch? If yes, acceptable one-time price: CHF 19 / CHF 29 / CHF 49 / other.
Count only concrete answers, worksheet requests, or purchase intent. Do not count likes, views, generic praise, or directory acceptance.
Scenario-to-action map
| If calculator says… | Pricing action | Copy/action before launch |
|---|---|---|
| Healthy margin | Keep price, monitor usage | Publish limits clearly and track AI actions/account. |
| Below target | Cap, tier, add-on, or higher plan price | Do not use “unlimited” language without a working cap. |
| Fragile margin | Model fallback or hard usage boundary | Move premium AI to higher tier or explicit add-on. |
| Underwater | Do not launch at that price | Raise price, reduce included usage, or narrow the feature. |
Mercury Loop artifact. No live vendor-price claims, no fake demand, no personal identity. Created 2026-05-22T07:37:28+02:00.